Oiketos

Our approach · Defining leadership requirements

Leadership requirements begin with the work ahead.

Oiketos helps organizations turn their situation and ambitions into leadership requirements․ We propose which capabilities deserve priority and explain how they serve the appointment․

A useful requirement connects the leadership needed for the appointment with the resources, relationships and constraints of the role․

Oiketos helps connect organizational context and future role demands with capability requirements, giving the team a basis for deciding which candidate evidence matters․

Understand the business situation

Your knowledge of the business is the starting point․ We explore strategy, goals and pressures, and what the executive can influence․ Culture, stakeholder relationships and available resources shape the task․

We also examine what needs to be preserved, which uncertainties matter and where expectations may conflict․

Translate objectives into leadership work

Translate a desired result into the decisions, cooperation and trade-offs the executive must lead with people, resources and authority․

A goal such as improving service becomes useful for selection when the work needed to achieve it is specified․ That might mean coordinating expertise across teams, resolving competing commitments or redesigning how decisions are made․ Each calls for a different emphasis in the requirements․

Make the required capability specific

We describe the leadership capability needed to carry out that work, connecting resources, judgment and action in the organization․

“Build cooperation across teams with competing commitments” identifies a leadership task more clearly than “a collaborative leader”․ This description directs the search toward candidate decisions and actions․

Give the priorities a reason

We propose which capabilities should carry greater weight by examining the most consequential demands, the constraints on action and the risks attached to falling short․

Some requirements may be essential conditions for the appointment․ Others distinguish stronger contributions to its particular goals․ Discuss these differences when setting the priorities․

Specify the evidence worth seeking

Selection research emphasizes the match between what an assessment examines and the performance it is intended to predict․

Examine candidate decisions and actions, their working conditions and the contribution of others against the requirements․ Use this connection to guide interviews, references and other assessments․

Agree the requirements before comparing candidates

Decision-makers and executive search professionals test the reasoning, resolve differences and agree on the criteria before examining candidates․

Document the agreed criteria and their reasons․ Revisit them and record changes when the mandate or business situation alters․

Put the requirements to work

Executive Selection Brief prepares the context, proposed capability priorities and their rationale for this discussion․

Our Research & evidence page explains the research contributions behind this approach and the scope of the available evidence․